CULTURE AND ANARCHY
The classic History of
English Literature written by David Daiches describes Matthew Arnold as-
“The literary critic is no dilettante or optional luxury in
civilization: he is, or ought to be, one of its mainstays, perhaps indeed its
high priest.” (973)
Arnold was a cultural critic who worked as an inspector of schools. Arnold as a critic is
widely known for his critical works like-
Essays in Criticism (1865)
In these writings, the predominant values of the Victorian era are greatly reflected. His writings
mostly are idealistic which directly connects him to the Victorian Era as
idealism was one of the literary characteristics of the age.
Well, this blog is a thinking
activity assigned by Prof. Dr. Dilip Barad Sir to prepare a chart on key points
of the classic essay, “Culture and Anarchy” & describe the way we understand
them in each chapter of the essay. In Culture and
Anarchy, Matthew Arnold (1822-88) articulated a theory of culture that
continues to influence thinking about the value of the humanities in higher
education.
Culture and
Anarchy is a series of periodical essays by Matthew Arnold, first published in
Cornhill Magazine 1867-68 and collected as a book in 1869. The preface was
added in 1875. (Wikipedia)
Chapters
|
Key Points
|
My understanding
|
Preamble-
What is Culture?
|
|
Arnold’s ideas are too idealistic to relate with contemporary
happenings.
Today, it can be assumed that culture is a superficial recognition
of an individual’s identity.
The ‘subject’ is merely ignored and the perfectionism of
culture should not turn into hideousness of must performing duty.
|
Chapter 1.
|
|
It can be said that Arnold wants to convey by quoting Jonathan Swift's phrase- "Two noblest things- Sweetness and Light" that the ancient writers were maintaining the classical forms like beehive and the modern writers are like spiders weaving a web to trap and satarize other writers.
|
Chapter 2.
|
By sugges |
|
Thank you.
Post a Comment